These days one of the most discussed topics among fans about the Rossoneri coach Massimiliano Allegri. E 'to coach at a big club like Milan or has been overestimated? Legitimate doubts as to observe the first two months of the season. Indeed, the only convincing performance of his AC Milan from the end of August against Lecce and forward to that challenge only the Rossoneri have struggled and suffered despite winning several matches. As I for one am extremely disappointed by his actions. Cagliari showed her a big game combined with a competitive intensity that few other teams in recent years have been able to show in the Italian league. I thought I was a young coach with a mindset and a vision of modern football could be a blessing in a group as old and battered and I hoped that the Rossoneri "anchovies" could revolutionize established hierarchies within the squad. Unfortunately the first two months of the season are giving me wrong.
This summer I had the illusion that the grafting of young spring as Merkel, and Strasser Oduamadi could be definitive, these guys would come in effect in pink. And I thought that would be a clear signal to the veterans, a meritocracy and a hymn to praise the anger and the competitive desire to win. Instead it was only a turn-over in summer time when the games are friendly and you start to become important Allegri has returned to Milan's historic address to the group. Please do not say that I Oduamadi Strasser and deserved to play because the former is essentially "untested" because he played very little and has only the second rate because technically and tactically Merkel is non-existent but at least deserved to be shortlisted in the midfield. The guy has played really well and this summer has convinced against opponents prestigious as Arsenal, Juventus and Inter. Certainly it is soccer in August but if you do not give confidence to young people when you are available to a midfield that is identical to that of nine years ago when you should do it? If Van Gaal was right Allegri today as neither Germany nor Bayern Monaco could count on this great player who is Muller. The boy was playing in Bayern's reserve team and was not even in the pink when he got the Dutchman. Van Gaal, however, was attracted by the talent of the German lens and decided to bring it into the first team giving him confidence to make the holder. The results are there for all to see and ignoring the most glaring example of Muller could also make the names of Badstuber and happy. So why not try to focus on Merkel? Unanswered question. Unfortunately for anchovies
errors certainly do not end here. The most serious problem regarding his team is the absence of a tactical default form. How to play AC Milan? With the 4-3-1-2 or 4-3-3? We are in November but has not been found yet to answer a question for the first time in July. This summer we were all convinced that Ronaldinho could not play behind two strikers because it was not his role, not because we wanted to play and made it more like the left external attack. Allegri also must have made the same kind of reasoning and fact in his first official match Lecce lined up against the Brazilian left off despite the presidential diktat did not want to see Denton and Pato on the wings. AC Milan played a great game, won 4-0 and all seemed clear what was the way forward. Robinho Ibrahimovic and then came and went Huntelaar and Borriello. Allegri has tried not merely to change form and enter Ibra instead of Borriello. The problem is that the Swede does not seem to particularly love the pattern with two external attackers, as was shown in Barcelona and the first part of Mourinho's first season at Inter, when Inter played with Mancini and Quaresma. At the same time having more Pato could make him a near first tip can open his space as he had also included in 2008/2009 when Ancelotti sent to the bench for three games to play with Ronaldinho-Kaka-Pato Borriello before the Italian striker is injured.
Allegri then have thought that you could try moving Ronaldinho on the trocar in order to apply this 4-3-1-2 that had brought him so well in Cagliari. He first tested the module with Seedorf in that role to Amsterdam and then put the Brazilian juggler. Parma v Chievo and the Denton has behaved very well, but in front of an opponent like Real is literally disappeared from the field, proving totally inadequate in that position. Allegri then tried to put behind Robinho tips and against Napoli worked pretty well. Binho runs much more than Dinho, is technical but not as the former Barcelona and knows when to sacrifice coverage as it is never the Denton. It seems the right choice but the match against Juventus shows that Robinho can try to play attacking midfielder but is not his natural role. Often happened to see the Brazilian expand to receive the ball or to attack the deep things that should not make a playmaker since they would play three lines and from a central location. But that's not the fault of Binh has always played second striker or a striker or outside. The truth is that Milan can not play because the 4-3-1-2 does not even have a true playmaker. Seedorf, Ronaldinho and Robinho are players able to play that role but only in emergencies and only on certain occasions. And we are so confident that Ibra and Pato not render the form with the two external attack?
The Swede has made 4 of his 7 goals with the Rossoneri playing 4-3-3 and the best season of Pato to AC Milan was the last, when the duck has played as right outside the Trident of Leonardo. In the last games will be played near Ibra but did absolutely nothing. Certainly the 4-3-1-2 ensures greater coverage but also in this case we must pay attention to men in camp. If the playmaker Ronaldinho, you are really sure that the midfield would be more protected than the 4-3-3? I do not believe that the Brazilian is refusing to return even as he does when he plays wide left. So since we have players who give the best of them playing with the Trident is returning to play with the 4-3-3, as the team was "built" (big word) for this form of gambling. Also because the three up front can help even the midfield and in particular a player: Kevin Prince Boateng.
The boy has charmed in his first outings with AC Milan with a large capacity for insertion and walking really good for a midfielder theory of containment. But since he returned to the diamond, Boateng has done little or nothing to the disappointing performance on Saturday. It is not his fault. To play in the diamond must be tactically disciplined and have good feet if you have not met the three in midfield. The problem is that Allegri play with Gattuso-Pirlo-Boateng, or two meetings and a director, without any quality midfielder like Seedorf of AC Milan's Ancelotti. Boateng has good feet, but is certainly not a technical player. Also playing with the playmaker and the two peaks near the space for entries is reduced and it becomes complicated for the "Prince" running forward as he did against Auxerre. If you add to this that Allegri recently done the same play on the center-left, preventing so, he has a right to expand and maybe try to cross because every time he went to the bottom would fall on the natural foot, we can understand why the Ghanaian no longer able to impress as the first part. In this case it is a choice difficult to understand as the best game of the season was Gattuso Milan-Genoa Rino where he played on the center-left. Why the hell has them mixed up? Mystery of faith.
Confusion reigns supreme tactic and it is difficult to see AC Milan play twice in a row with the same format. Allegri continues to change, try and change the structure of the game but if it continues to meet the risk is in January with the same concerns this summer. Anchovies have to do something and not just from a tactical point of view. His Milan has no character, no grit, no hungry for victories. Some of you might argue that it is difficult to motivate players like Seedorf, Pirlo and company but no one forces them to play Allegri. For example we are so confident that Flamini can not offer the benefits of Gattuso? A player who can not count on an excellent technique to play with continuity to make the most of and then it is easy to criticize the French if you beating once every blue moon can not give a great performance. Flamini even with its flaws of excessive heat agonist is a midfielder of character and race, with good capacity for integration and discrete feet (for example, I would not be opposed to even see him right back). E 'young, hungry, has balls, why not bet on him? I know that this reasoning may seem unpopular in the aftermath of a vigorous performance as that offered by Rino against Real. It 's true that Gattuso's charisma is important also for his teammates but also to look ahead. Flamini could be sold this summer without ever having really tried. It is worth giving up a boy of 26 years to focus on thirty-two at the end of career? And why not throw into the fray also Strasser? The boy speaks very well and if we put against Lazio a boy of 19 years in marking Ronaldinho do not see why every now and AC Milan can not play with Strasser instead of the usual Gattuso and Ambrosini. And because the defense never plays as a defender Yepes, who last year made the defense of one of the least Chievo beat the league and has international experience having played for River Plate and Paris St-Germain? Would not it be better Sokratis?
short, the Milan looks like a building site ever open horizon that does not seem to see the end of the work. It 'obvious that the team found disturbing shortcomings (see the lack of full backs height) and that there are around Europe but our teams are well above the this should not be a mitigating factor for the coach. If Leonardo was able, in one way or another, to fight for the title with a technically inferior and dysfunctional group also showed flashes of great football, Allegri has an obligation to show the public the San Siro Milan a competitive, aggressive and fun. Unfortunately, the sad feeling that prevails observing its modus operandi is that the count Max is more concerned not to jeopardize relations with the President and senators rather than build something new and revolutionary. Allegri is building his insurance policy for the future by putting his side and the historical group president of the locker room. Evidently impressed by the treatment Leo after a great season just to have turned against the president and some players uncomfortable, Allegri is trying to combine tactics and public relations needs in order to earn an extended stay in that Milanello.
choice understandable from his point of view, but definitely a loser mentality. At least the Emperor Fatih Terim had brought with him his ideas in Milan too extravagant and offensive football, as well as his personality and overflowing theater. That Milan had something of his own, with results "zemaniani" discontinuity and performance. AC Milan but is neither fish nor fowl. Not good but not even be evil. And 'mediocre and there is no nothing worse than mediocrity
0 comments:
Post a Comment